Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging

Anti-counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market Outlook

The global anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is projected to reach a valuation of approximately USD 3.5 billion by 2035, with a remarkable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 12.5% during the forecast period from 2025 to 2035. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing concerns regarding product authenticity among consumers, coupled with the rising prevalence of counterfeit cosmetics in the market. The cosmetic industry's expansion, particularly in emerging regions, is further propelling the need for robust anti-counterfeit solutions. Additionally, the growing influence of social media and online shopping has made it essential for brands to ensure the integrity of their products, leading to an increased adoption of sophisticated packaging technologies to deter counterfeiters. As such, manufacturers are focusing on integrating advanced materials and technologies in their packaging solutions to protect their brand reputation and ensure consumer safety.

Growth Factor of the Market

The anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is experiencing significant growth due to several key factors. Firstly, the increasing incidence of counterfeit cosmetic products poses a serious risk to consumer health and safety, prompting brands to invest more in protective packaging solutions. Furthermore, the rise in disposable income coupled with heightened awareness of brand authenticity among consumers is driving demand for high-quality packaging that includes anti-counterfeit features. Innovative technologies such as holograms, QR codes, and tamper-evident seals are gaining traction as effective deterrents against counterfeiting. Additionally, regulatory mandates in various regions aimed at ensuring product safety and authenticity are pushing manufacturers to adopt advanced packaging technologies. The e-commerce boom has also intensified the need for reliable anti-counterfeit packaging as online sales of cosmetics grow rapidly, making it crucial for brands to establish trust with consumers.

Key Highlights of the Market

• Projected market size of USD 3.5 billion by 2035 with a CAGR of 12.5%.
• Increased consumer awareness regarding the dangers of counterfeit cosmetics.
• Adoption of advanced packaging technologies such as QR codes and holograms.
• Impact of e-commerce growth on the demand for secure packaging solutions.
• Regulatory pressures driving innovation and compliance in packaging.

By Product Type

Bottles & Jars:

Bottles and jars are among the most popular packaging options in the cosmetics industry, serving a variety of products from skincare creams to hair serums. They provide an effective barrier against contaminants, preserving product integrity. The demand for glass bottles and jars is particularly high, as they offer a premium feel and are recyclable, aligning well with consumer preferences for sustainable options. Additionally, advancements in closure technologies have enhanced the functionality of these containers, making them more secure against tampering. Brands are increasingly opting for bottles and jars with unique designs and finishes, which not only attract consumers but also help in distinguishing authentic products from counterfeits.

Tubes:

Tubes serve as another essential packaging type in the cosmetics sector, especially for products like lotions, creams, and gels. Their ability to dispense products smoothly without contamination makes them highly desirable. The rise in demand for travel-sized and portable cosmetics has further fueled the growth of tube packaging. Manufacturers are innovating with materials that provide better barrier properties and are lightweight, facilitating ease of transport. The use of anti-counterfeit technologies such as holographic labels on tubes is also gaining traction, ensuring that consumers can easily verify the authenticity of the product before purchase.

Pouches:

Pouches have carved a niche in the cosmetics packaging market due to their versatility and lightweight nature. They are particularly popular for samples and single-use applications, providing brands with an economical and practical solution. As the trend towards minimalistic and sustainable packaging continues, pouches made from eco-friendly materials are becoming a preferred choice for both brands and consumers. The incorporation of anti-counterfeit features such as QR codes that can link to product information or authentication websites is becoming a common practice to enhance consumer trust.

Sachets:

Sachets are similar to pouches but are typically smaller and are often used for single-use samples of cosmetics. They are an excellent way for brands to offer consumers a trial of their products without committing to a full-sized item. The growth in e-commerce has boosted the demand for sachets as brands seek to provide consumers with affordable trial options that can be easily shipped. Brands are also leveraging this packaging format to include anti-counterfeit measures such as unique serial numbers that consumers can check online to confirm authenticity, thereby enhancing customer confidence.

Others:

This category encompasses various forms of packaging such as jars made from bamboo, refillable containers, and other innovative formats that cater to niche markets. The trend towards sustainability is driving many brands to explore alternative packaging solutions that reduce environmental impact. These eco-conscious packaging options often come with features that deter counterfeiting, such as distinctive shapes or textures that are harder for counterfeiters to replicate. As the market grows, brands are likely to invest in research and development to create even more innovative and secure packaging options that appeal to modern consumers.

By Material Type

Plastic:

Plastic remains a dominant material in cosmetics packaging due to its versatility, lightweight nature, and cost-effectiveness. It allows for a wide range of designs while providing sufficient protection for the product inside. However, the environmental concerns surrounding plastic waste have led to the development of biodegradable and recyclable options. The integration of anti-counterfeit technologies such as color-changing inks or embedded RFID chips in plastic packaging is also becoming more common, enabling brands to enhance security while addressing sustainability concerns.

Glass:

Glass is highly regarded for its premium appearance and ability to preserve product quality, making it a favored choice for high-end cosmetic products. Its non-reactive nature ensures that the contents remain uncontaminated, which is crucial for sensitive skincare formulations. The market is witnessing a trend towards using recycled glass, which not only supports sustainability but also appeals to environmentally conscious consumers. The use of tamper-evident seals and unique glass designs further contributes to the anti-counterfeiting efforts in this segment, providing consumers with confidence in their purchases.

Metal:

Metal packaging, particularly aluminum, is gaining popularity for various cosmetic products due to its lightweight and durable characteristics. It is often used in aerosol sprays and containers that require protection from light and air. The recyclability of metals also aligns with the growing demand for sustainable packaging solutions. Anti-counterfeiting measures in metal packaging often include specialized coatings and engraved designs that are difficult to replicate, ensuring that consumers can readily identify authentic products. This trend is expected to continue as brands increasingly look for ways to enhance product security.

Paperboard:

Paperboard is an eco-friendly option that is becoming more prevalent in the cosmetics packaging market, especially for outer packaging such as boxes and sleeves. It provides an opportunity for brands to enhance their product's shelf appeal through creative designs and finishes. The ability to incorporate QR codes or unique holographic elements on paperboard packaging strengthens anti-counterfeiting measures while maintaining the aesthetic appeal of the product. As consumers seek more sustainable options, the demand for paperboard packaging is expected to rise, with brands investing in innovative designs that communicate authenticity.

Others:

The "Others" category includes materials such as bioplastics, plant-based polymers, and other innovative materials that cater to niche markets. The cosmetics industry is witnessing a shift towards more sustainable, innovative materials that align with consumer preferences for eco-friendly products. Brands are experimenting with alternative materials that not only serve as effective packaging solutions but also incorporate anti-counterfeit features. The development of these materials is expected to grow, fostering a competitive edge for brands that prioritize sustainability and product security.

By Counterfeit Technology

Holograms:

Holograms are a widely recognized anti-counterfeit technology that offers a sophisticated way to authenticate products. They provide a visual deterrent against counterfeiting through unique designs that are difficult to replicate. Holograms can be applied to various packaging types, including bottles and boxes, making them a versatile option for cosmetic brands. As technology advances, brands are exploring more complex holographic designs that change appearance based on viewing angles, further enhancing security. The use of holograms not only protects products but also adds an element of luxury, appealing to high-end consumers.

QR Codes:

QR codes have emerged as a popular tool in the fight against counterfeiting due to their accessibility and ease of use. Brands can print QR codes on their packaging, allowing consumers to scan them with their smartphones to verify authenticity or access product information. This technology bridges the gap between physical products and digital content, providing a seamless experience for consumers. Additionally, QR codes can be tracked to monitor the product's journey from manufacturer to retailer, providing valuable insights into distribution channels. As smartphone penetration increases, the adoption of QR codes is expected to soar, making them a key player in anti-counterfeit strategies.

Taggants:

Taggants are unique markers that can be embedded in packaging materials or products to verify authenticity. These substances can be either visible or invisible and are designed to be difficult to replicate, making them an excellent choice for brands seeking to protect their products. The application of taggants in cosmetics packaging is gaining momentum as it provides an additional layer of security while remaining cost-effective. Consumers can verify the presence of taggants through specialized scanning devices, creating a straightforward method for checking authenticity. This technology is expected to grow in significance as brands continue to prioritize product security.

Watermarks:

Watermarks have long been used as a security feature in various industries, and their application in cosmetics packaging is increasingly common. They can be incorporated into labels or packaging materials and are designed to be visible under specific light conditions. This unique feature makes it challenging for counterfeiters to duplicate packaging accurately. Watermarks serve not only as a security measure but also as a branding tool, allowing companies to showcase their commitment to quality and authenticity. The integration of watermarks into cosmetic packaging is expected to grow, as brands seek reliable ways to assure consumers of their product's legitimacy.

Tamper-evident Packaging:

Tamper-evident packaging is an essential component of anti-counterfeit strategies, providing consumers with a clear indication that a product has been compromised. Such packaging often includes seals or closures that are broken upon first use, ensuring that consumers can easily identify whether a product has been tampered with. This technology is increasingly being adopted in the cosmetics industry, particularly for products that require consumer safety. The desire for enhanced consumer protection will drive the demand for tamper-evident solutions, as brands look to build trust and loyalty among their customers.

By User

Skincare:

The skincare segment is one of the largest and most dynamic markets in the cosmetics industry, with a growing emphasis on anti-counterfeit measures. As consumers become more conscious about the products they apply to their skin, the demand for secure and authentic skincare packaging has surged. Brands are adopting advanced packaging solutions that not only enhance product safety but also convey a sense of luxury and quality. By integrating anti-counterfeit features such as holograms and QR codes, skincare brands can protect their products from counterfeiters while assuring customers of their authenticity. This trend is expected to continue as the skincare market expands further in both established and emerging regions.

Haircare:

The haircare segment is also witnessing a significant increase in the demand for anti-counterfeit packaging as consumers seek reliable and safe products. As the market grows, brands are investing in packaging that not only showcases their products but also includes advanced security features. The incorporation of technologies such as tamper-evident seals and QR codes on haircare products is becoming commonplace, providing consumers with confidence in the authenticity of their purchases. Furthermore, as the market expands into e-commerce, ensuring product authenticity becomes even more critical, driving the demand for secure packaging solutions in the haircare sector.

Makeup:

The makeup segment is characterized by intense competition, making product differentiation essential. As counterfeit makeup products pose risks to consumer safety, brands are increasingly focusing on implementing robust anti-counterfeit packaging solutions. This includes unique packaging designs that are harder to replicate, along with technologies such as taggants and holographic seals to protect against duplication. With the rise of social media influencers and online beauty tutorials, the demand for authentic makeup products is surging, prompting brands to invest in secure packaging that enhances their reputation and fosters consumer loyalty.

Fragrances:

The fragrances segment faces significant challenges from counterfeit products, which can undermine brand reputation and consumer trust. As a result, fragrance brands are leveraging advanced packaging solutions to protect their products from counterfeiting. The use of high-quality materials along with anti-counterfeit technologies such as watermarks and tamper-evident packaging is becoming increasingly common. This focus on security not only safeguards consumer interests but also preserves the brand's image in a competitive market. As the demand for luxury fragrances continues to rise, so will the need for innovative packaging solutions that ensure authenticity.

Others:

The "Others" category encompasses a range of cosmetic products that do not fit neatly into the primary segments. This can include items such as bath and body products, beauty tools, and other niche offerings. As consumer preferences evolve, brands in this category are also focusing on enhancing the security of their products through innovative packaging solutions. The integration of anti-counterfeit features is becoming increasingly vital, particularly as the market expands both in-store and online. Brands are exploring distinct packaging designs and advanced technologies that resonate with consumers while providing the necessary protection against counterfeiting.

By Region

The anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is witnessing significant growth across various regions, driven by increasing consumer awareness and demand for product authenticity. North America is expected to dominate the market, accounting for approximately 35% of the global share due to the presence of major cosmetic brands and stringent regulatory frameworks aimed at protecting consumers. The CAGR for North America is projected to be around 13% during the forecast period, as brands continue to invest in innovative packaging technologies to combat counterfeiting effectively. Meanwhile, Europe follows closely, with a market share of 30%, bolstered by established luxury brands that prioritize security and authenticity in their product offerings.

In the Asia Pacific region, the anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is expected to witness the highest growth rate, with a CAGR of approximately 14% from 2025 to 2035. The increasing disposable income coupled with rising beauty consciousness among consumers in countries such as China and India is driving demand for secure packaging solutions. The region is projected to hold around 25% of the global market share as local brands adopt advanced packaging technologies to build trust with their consumers. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, although smaller markets, are also anticipated to grow steadily, with respective shares of 5% and 5%, as the demand for authentic cosmetics products continues to rise.

Opportunities

The anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is poised for substantial opportunities as consumer awareness around the dangers of counterfeit products continues to grow. Brands can leverage this trend by investing in research and development to create packaging solutions that not only deter counterfeiting but also enhance user experience. The integration of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain for supply chain transparency can pave the way for new innovations in packaging. As e-commerce continues to flourish, especially post-pandemic, brands have an opportunity to engage consumers through innovative online platforms that highlight product authenticity while enhancing brand loyalty. This shift provides brands with the chance to differentiate themselves through enhanced customer engagement and experience, ultimately driving sales and market growth.

Moreover, the rise of social media and influencer marketing presents an opportunity for brands to harness these channels for promoting their anti-counterfeit initiatives. By effectively communicating their commitment to product authenticity through various marketing strategies, brands can build trust with consumers and attract new customers. Furthermore, as sustainability becomes a core focus for consumers, brands that adopt eco-friendly packaging options with anti-counterfeit features will likely capture a larger share of the market. This alignment with consumer values can serve as a competitive advantage, ultimately enhancing brand reputation and market presence.

Threats

One of the major threats facing the anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is the rapid evolution of counterfeiting techniques. As technology advances, counterfeiters are increasingly employing sophisticated methods to replicate genuine products, making it challenging for brands to stay ahead. This creates a constant need for innovation in packaging technologies and anti-counterfeit measures, which can strain resources and budgets for many companies. Additionally, the global nature of the cosmetics market means that brands often contend with differing regulatory environments, which can complicate the implementation of comprehensive anti-counterfeit strategies. The increased reliance on digital channels for marketing and sales also exposes brands to risks associated with online counterfeit products, as consumers may inadvertently purchase fake items from unverified sellers.

Another significant threat is the potential for consumer skepticism regarding product authenticity claims. As awareness of counterfeit products grows, consumers may become more questioning of the products they purchase, leading to a potential decline in brand loyalty. Brands must work diligently to communicate their authenticity measures effectively and create transparent channels through which consumers can verify product legitimacy. Failure to do so could result in reputational damage and loss of market share. Furthermore, the cost associated with implementing advanced anti-counterfeit technologies can be a barrier for smaller brands, limiting their ability to compete in an increasingly crowded marketplace.

Restrainer factors in the market include the cost of advanced anti-counterfeit packaging technologies, which can be prohibitively high for many small and medium-sized enterprises. While larger corporations can absorb these costs more easily, smaller brands may struggle to implement necessary security measures, limiting their competitiveness. Additionally, there may be a lack of consumer awareness regarding available anti-counterfeit technologies, hindering their effectiveness in deterring counterfeit products. Brands must invest in education and marketing efforts to inform consumers about the significance of these technologies in securing their products. Lastly, the fluctuating prices of raw materials and economic instability in various regions can create challenges for manufacturers in sourcing high-quality materials for packaging solutions.

Competitor Outlook

• Amcor plc
• WestRock Company
• Sealed Air Corporation
• Smurfit Kappa Group
• Berry Global, Inc.
• Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
• Crown Holdings, Inc.
• Sonoco Products Company
• Huhtamaki Oyj
• Mondi Group
• Pact Group Holdings Ltd
• Sappi Limited
• Innerpack
• Sustainable Packaging Group
• DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

The competitive landscape of the anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market is characterized by a diverse range of players, ranging from large multinational corporations to specialized companies focusing on innovation. Major companies such as Amcor plc and WestRock Company hold significant market shares due to their extensive product portfolios and global presence. These companies are investing heavily in research and development to create innovative packaging solutions that incorporate advanced anti-counterfeit technologies. Additionally, they are focusing on sustainability, recognizing that eco-friendly packaging is increasingly important to consumers. As competition intensifies, these leading companies are likely to continue enhancing their offerings to meet evolving consumer demands.

Smaller and niche players are also entering the market, leveraging advancements in technology and sustainable practices to carve out their market share. Companies such as Innerpack and Sustainable Packaging Group are focusing on providing customizable and eco-friendly packaging solutions with integrated anti-counterfeit features. This trend towards specialization allows these companies to differentiate themselves in a crowded market. The rise of e-commerce and the need for secure packaging options are presenting opportunities for both established and emerging players to thrive by addressing consumer concerns about counterfeit products.

Moreover, strategic partnerships and collaborations are becoming increasingly common as companies seek to expand their reach and enhance their product offerings. Collaborations between packaging manufacturers and technology providers are facilitating the development of innovative anti-counterfeit technologies, enabling brands to create more secure packaging solutions. As the market continues to evolve, companies that prioritize innovation, sustainability, and consumer engagement will likely lead the way in shaping the future of the anti-counterfeit cosmetics packaging market.

• 1 Appendix

  • 1.1 List of Tables
  • 1.2 List of Figures

• 2 Introduction

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Scope of the Report
  • 2.3 Study Assumptions
  • 2.4 Base Currency & Forecast Periods

• 3 Market Dynamics

  • 3.1 Market Growth Factors
  • 3.2 Economic & Global Events
  • 3.3 Innovation Trends
  • 3.4 Supply Chain Analysis

• 4 Consumer Behavior

  • 4.1 Market Trends
  • 4.2 Pricing Analysis
  • 4.3 Buyer Insights

• 5 Key Player Profiles

  • 5.1 Amcor plc
    • 5.1.1 Business Overview
    • 5.1.2 Products & Services
    • 5.1.3 Financials
    • 5.1.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.1.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.2 Innerpack
    • 5.2.1 Business Overview
    • 5.2.2 Products & Services
    • 5.2.3 Financials
    • 5.2.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.2.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.3 Mondi Group
    • 5.3.1 Business Overview
    • 5.3.2 Products & Services
    • 5.3.3 Financials
    • 5.3.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.3.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.4 Huhtamaki Oyj
    • 5.4.1 Business Overview
    • 5.4.2 Products & Services
    • 5.4.3 Financials
    • 5.4.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.4.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.5 Sappi Limited
    • 5.5.1 Business Overview
    • 5.5.2 Products & Services
    • 5.5.3 Financials
    • 5.5.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.5.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.6 WestRock Company
    • 5.6.1 Business Overview
    • 5.6.2 Products & Services
    • 5.6.3 Financials
    • 5.6.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.6.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.7 Berry Global, Inc.
    • 5.7.1 Business Overview
    • 5.7.2 Products & Services
    • 5.7.3 Financials
    • 5.7.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.7.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.8 Smurfit Kappa Group
    • 5.8.1 Business Overview
    • 5.8.2 Products & Services
    • 5.8.3 Financials
    • 5.8.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.8.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.9 Crown Holdings, Inc.
    • 5.9.1 Business Overview
    • 5.9.2 Products & Services
    • 5.9.3 Financials
    • 5.9.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.9.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.10 Sealed Air Corporation
    • 5.10.1 Business Overview
    • 5.10.2 Products & Services
    • 5.10.3 Financials
    • 5.10.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.10.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.11 DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
    • 5.11.1 Business Overview
    • 5.11.2 Products & Services
    • 5.11.3 Financials
    • 5.11.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.11.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.12 Pact Group Holdings Ltd
    • 5.12.1 Business Overview
    • 5.12.2 Products & Services
    • 5.12.3 Financials
    • 5.12.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.12.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.13 Sonoco Products Company
    • 5.13.1 Business Overview
    • 5.13.2 Products & Services
    • 5.13.3 Financials
    • 5.13.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.13.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.14 Sustainable Packaging Group
    • 5.14.1 Business Overview
    • 5.14.2 Products & Services
    • 5.14.3 Financials
    • 5.14.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.14.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 5.15 Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
    • 5.15.1 Business Overview
    • 5.15.2 Products & Services
    • 5.15.3 Financials
    • 5.15.4 Recent Developments
    • 5.15.5 SWOT Analysis

• 6 Market Segmentation

  • 6.1 Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market, By User
    • 6.1.1 Skincare
    • 6.1.2 Haircare
    • 6.1.3 Makeup
    • 6.1.4 Fragrances
    • 6.1.5 Others
  • 6.2 Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market, By Product Type
    • 6.2.1 Bottles & Jars
    • 6.2.2 Tubes
    • 6.2.3 Pouches
    • 6.2.4 Sachets
    • 6.2.5 Others
  • 6.3 Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market, By Material Type
    • 6.3.1 Plastic
    • 6.3.2 Glass
    • 6.3.3 Metal
    • 6.3.4 Paperboard
    • 6.3.5 Others
  • 6.4 Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market, By counterfeit Technology
    • 6.4.1 Holograms
    • 6.4.2 QR Codes
    • 6.4.3 Taggants
    • 6.4.4 Watermarks
    • 6.4.5 Tamper-evident Packaging

• 7 Competitive Analysis

  • 7.1 Key Player Comparison
  • 7.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 7.3 Investment Trends
  • 7.4 SWOT Analysis

• 8 Research Methodology

  • 8.1 Analysis Design
  • 8.2 Research Phases
  • 8.3 Study Timeline

• 9 Future Market Outlook

  • 9.1 Growth Forecast
  • 9.2 Market Evolution

• 10 Geographical Overview

  • 10.1 Europe - Market Analysis
    • 10.1.1 By Country
      • 10.1.1.1 UK
      • 10.1.1.2 France
      • 10.1.1.3 Germany
      • 10.1.1.4 Spain
      • 10.1.1.5 Italy
  • 10.2 Asia Pacific - Market Analysis
    • 10.2.1 By Country
      • 10.2.1.1 India
      • 10.2.1.2 China
      • 10.2.1.3 Japan
      • 10.2.1.4 South Korea
  • 10.3 Latin America - Market Analysis
    • 10.3.1 By Country
      • 10.3.1.1 Brazil
      • 10.3.1.2 Argentina
      • 10.3.1.3 Mexico
  • 10.4 North America - Market Analysis
    • 10.4.1 By Country
      • 10.4.1.1 USA
      • 10.4.1.2 Canada
  • 10.5 Middle East & Africa - Market Analysis
    • 10.5.1 By Country
      • 10.5.1.1 Middle East
      • 10.5.1.2 Africa
  • 10.6 Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging Market by Region

• 11 Global Economic Factors

  • 11.1 Inflation Impact
  • 11.2 Trade Policies

• 12 Technology & Innovation

  • 12.1 Emerging Technologies
  • 12.2 AI & Digital Trends
  • 12.3 Patent Research

• 13 Investment & Market Growth

  • 13.1 Funding Trends
  • 13.2 Future Market Projections

• 14 Market Overview & Key Insights

  • 14.1 Executive Summary
  • 14.2 Key Trends
  • 14.3 Market Challenges
  • 14.4 Regulatory Landscape

Segments Analyzed in the Report

The global Anti counterfeit Cosmetics Packaging market is categorized based on

By Product Type

• Bottles & Jars
• Tubes
• Pouches
• Sachets
• Others

By Material Type

• Plastic
• Glass
• Metal
• Paperboard
• Others

By counterfeit Technology

• Holograms
• QR Codes
• Taggants
• Watermarks
• Tamper-evident Packaging

By User

• Skincare
• Haircare
• Makeup
• Fragrances
• Others

By Region

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East & Africa

Key Players

• Amcor plc
• WestRock Company
• Sealed Air Corporation
• Smurfit Kappa Group
• Berry Global, Inc.
• Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
• Crown Holdings, Inc.
• Sonoco Products Company
• Huhtamaki Oyj
• Mondi Group
• Pact Group Holdings Ltd
• Sappi Limited
• Innerpack
• Sustainable Packaging Group
• DuPont de Nemours, Inc.